
Look Who’s Talking (LWT) has positioned itself as a platform for influencer discovery and campaign management on YouTube and Instagram. However, many marketers face challenges such as limited platform coverage, opaque pricing, and less robust automation or eCommerce integrations. These limitations have led brands to explore more transparent, scalable, and versatile alternatives.
Among the available options, Influencer Hero stands out as a top alternative to LWT thanks to its all-in-one platform that includes influencer discovery, CRM, automated outreach, UGC management, affiliate tracking, and performance analytics. Its user-friendly interface and dedicated support make it a complete solution for brands looking to streamline campaigns, measure ROI, and optimize influencer partnerships efficiently.
In this article, we’ll review the leading LWT alternatives, offering a detailed comparison to help you choose the right platform for your brand’s marketing goals.
Top 10 Look Who's Talking (LWT) Alternatives
While Look Who’s Talking (LWT) covers many aspects of influencer marketing, it may not be the perfect fit for every brand. Businesses may face challenges with platform limitations, unclear pricing, and support scalability.
LWT currently focuses mainly on YouTube and Instagram. Brands seeking to run campaigns on platforms like TikTok, Facebook, or LinkedIn may find the coverage too narrow and need to rely on additional tools for cross-platform influencer marketing.
Unlike some competitors that publish clear pricing tiers, LWT does not make its pricing publicly available. This can make it difficult for startups and small businesses to budget accurately, especially since custom business plans may be required for advanced features.
While the platform is generally user-friendly, some users report challenges in mastering advanced data exports and analytics dashboards. Marketers new to influencer performance tracking may need onboarding or extra training to fully utilize these insights.
Although LWT offers campaign automation and streamlined workflows, certain advanced features are only available through custom business plans. This can limit flexibility for mid-sized businesses that don’t want to upgrade to enterprise-level agreements.
Standard support is available and includes useful features like direct chat with influencers, but more personalized account management appears to be reserved for larger clients. Smaller brands may find the level of guidance limited compared to platforms that include dedicated managers in lower-tier plans.
To compare the different platforms, we focused on central criteria that all must meet:
Platform Coverage: Look Who’s Talking connects brands with influencers primarily on YouTube and Instagram.
Best For: Brands, startups, PR and media agencies, and social media managers seeking a platform that streamlines influencer discovery, campaign management, and performance tracking.
Pricing: LWT’s pricing isn’t publicly listed, which shows lack of transparency and causes a loss of trust in the platform. It's always recommended to work with platforms that publicly list their pricing to ensure greater transparency.
Review: 4.3/5.0 (Capterra)
Ease of Use (UX/UI): LWT offers a clean interface for searching, filtering, and managing influencers. While its tools for campaign automation save time, some users note that data exports and advanced insights can take a learning curve for new marketers.
Customer Support: Provides onboarding support, direct chat with influencers, and subscription tracking. While standard support is responsive, personalized guidance or dedicated account managers may be limited to custom enterprise plans.
Platform Coverage: Influencer Hero supports influencer marketing across Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, Facebook, Pinterest, Snapchat, X (Twitter), and Twitch.
Best For: Influencer Hero is best for fast-scaling DTC brands and eCommerce businesses on Shopify, WooCommerce, or custom setups looking to run high-volume influencer, affiliate, and UGC campaigns from a single dashboard.
Pricing: Influencer Hero offers flexible monthly plans:
Reviews: 5.0 / 5.0 on Capterra
Ease of Use (UX/UI): The platform prioritizes simplicity in campaign execution, offering pre-built workflows and visual process maps. Even those new to influencer marketing can quickly adapt and move campaigns forward with little friction.
Customer Support: Every subscription includes direct access to an account manager, with higher tiers offering a dedicated Slack channel and routine strategy check-ins. Support is available 24/7 via chat, email, and an extensive knowledge hub.
Influencer Hero covers a broader range of platforms than LWT, including Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, Facebook, Pinterest, Snapchat, X, and Twitch. While LWT focuses primarily on YouTube and Instagram, Influencer Hero offers a multi-channel approach for brands looking to scale campaigns across different social media networks.
In terms of pricing, Influencer Hero is transparent with structured monthly plans ranging from $649 to $2,490 depending on campaign scale. LWT does not publicly disclose pricing, which can create uncertainty for brands comparing costs and ROI across platforms.
Both platforms offer campaign automation and analytics, but Influencer Hero stands out with its advanced creator filters, automated messaging workflows, and direct ecommerce integrations. LWT offers direct communication and audience insights, but Influencer Hero’s all-in-one dashboard and workflow optimization give it an edge for larger or fast-scaling DTC brands.
Platform coverage: Instagram, YouTube and TikTok. Limited functionality for influencers from Snapchat and X.
Pricing: Modash pricing starts at $199 per month. They also offer a medium tier plan fixed at a $499 rate. The enterprise level plan has custom pricing.
Reviews: 4.9/5.0 (Capterra)
Ease of Use (UX/UI): Clean interface optimized for rapid influencer discovery, with responsive filters and minimal loading times. Users can explore campaigns almost instantly without extensive onboarding.
Customer Support: Email support for all tiers, with live chat and priority response for premium plans. Knowledge base and tutorials assist efficient onboarding.
Modash supports Instagram, YouTube, and TikTok, giving brands access to popular creators while LWT primarily focuses on YouTube and Instagram. Both platforms provide robust analytics, but Modash includes specific tools for follower validation to reduce fraud risk.
Regarding pricing, Modash starts at $199/month with higher tiers at $499/month and custom enterprise plans, providing clearer transparency compared to LWT. LWT’s opaque pricing may require brands to contact the platform directly, which can slow down decision-making for budget-conscious teams.
Both platforms feature outreach management and campaign tracking, but Modash adds real-time post alerts and API integration for exporting analytics. LWT offers campaign automation and audience insights, but Modash’s structured pipeline and instant notifications support faster influencer monitoring and reporting.
Platform coverage: Upfluence covers Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, X, Twitch, Pinterest, and WordPress blogs.
Pricing:
Reviews: 4.6/5.0 (G2)
Best For: E-commerce brands and agencies looking to scale YouTube influencer outreach and track ROI.
Ease of Use (UX/UI): Upfluence is designed for large-scale influencer marketing, which gives it a steep but manageable learning curve. Experienced teams will appreciate its comprehensive workflow and campaign management tools.
Customer Support: Offers onboarding sessions, dedicated account managers for higher tiers, and responsive email/live chat support. Users can rely on structured guidance to quickly ramp up campaigns.
Upfluence covers Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, X, Twitch, Pinterest, and WordPress blogs, giving brands broader platform coverage than LWT. While LWT automates discovery and campaign management, Upfluence excels at large-scale influencer management and eCommerce integration for Shopify and WooCommerce.
Pricing for Upfluence is higher, with plans starting at $399/month for gifting-only campaigns and $1,276/month for full-service, versus LWT’s undisclosed pricing. The transparency of Upfluence’s plans helps brands better assess potential ROI and total campaign costs compared to LWT.
Upfluence offers advanced features like real-time dashboards, affiliate tracking, and centralized workflows, making it ideal for experienced teams running multiple campaigns. LWT provides direct communication and campaign automation, but Upfluence’s scale, live analytics, and robust workflow hub give it a stronger infrastructure for managing larger campaigns.
Platform coverage: Captiv8 covers Instagram, TikTok, Facebook, YouTube, X (formerly Twitter) and Twitch.
Pricing: $25.000 Annually (Annual commitment needed). Plus a $3.000 onboarding fee.
Reviews: 4.5/5.0 (G2)
Best for: Brands and agencies running large-scale influencer campaigns in platforms like Instagram, TikTok and YouTube.
Ease of Use (UX/UI): Offers robust tools for experienced marketers, though first-time users may require extra time to navigate. Interface is designed for large-scale campaigns and detailed analytics.
Customer Support: Provides personalized onboarding, campaign guidance, and dedicated account managers. Some users report slower responses for urgent billing or technical questions.
Captiv8 covers Instagram, TikTok, Facebook, YouTube, X, and Twitch, giving brands similar platform coverage to Upfluence and more than LWT. While LWT focuses on automation and audience insights, Captiv8 emphasizes collaborative workspaces, custom KPI dashboards, and secure data sharing for enterprise-level campaigns.
Pricing for Captiv8 requires a $25,000 annual commitment plus a $3,000 onboarding fee, which is significantly higher than typical monthly subscriptions but clearly defined compared to LWT’s opaque pricing. The upfront cost ensures brands know exactly what they are paying for, whereas LWT’s pricing uncertainty can complicate budgeting.
Both platforms offer influencer analytics and content tracking, but Captiv8 adds reusable search filters and team permission controls for smoother collaboration. LWT provides direct messaging and transparent bidding, but Captiv8’s structured dashboards and role-based access make it better suited for large, multi-team campaigns with complex workflow requirements.
Platform Coverage: CreatorIQ supports Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, Facebook, Pinterest, Twitch, and X (Twitter).
Pricing: CreatorIQ pricing is divided into 4 tiers:
An optional “Creator Connect” feature available for an additional $15,000 per yea
Reviews: 4.6/5.0 (G2)
Best For: Large-scale brands that require robust data controls, customizable workflows, and in-depth influencer analytics across international markets.
Ease of Use (UX/UI): CreatorIQ provides a polished interface aimed at enterprise teams handling multiple influencer programs simultaneously. Its workflow tools and automation options help reduce repetitive setup, though navigating the vast feature set requires practice.
Customer Support: Each client receives a dedicated account manager and ongoing strategy consultations. Global teams benefit from support that ensures campaigns consistently achieve performance targets.
CreatorIQ is designed for enterprise brands needing advanced analytics, secure collaboration links, and cross-border payment handling for international influencer campaigns. LWT offers a robust creator database and campaign automation, but CreatorIQ’s tools cater to large-scale operations with complex workflow requirements.
Pricing for CreatorIQ starts at $35,000/year for the basic plan and scales up to $200,000/year for enterprise use, which contrasts with LWT’s undisclosed pricing. This transparency allows large brands to plan budgets accurately when scaling campaigns globally.
CreatorIQ provides real-time campaign syncing, detailed audience filters, and expert strategic guidance, ensuring campaigns are precise and effective across regions. LWT delivers similar influencer discovery and content automation, but CreatorIQ’s enterprise focus and advanced workflow management provide higher control for global campaigns.
Platform Coverage: HypeAuditor supports Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, Twitch, X (Twitter), and Snapchat.
Pricing: Flexible usage-based pricing, with Business plans starting at around $10,000/year and Enterprise reaching up to $60,000/year.
Reviews: 4.6/5.0 (G2)
Best For: Teams that prioritize data accuracy, detecting fraudulent activity, and benchmarking competitors across various influencer platforms.
Ease of Use (UX/UI): HypeAuditor features a clean and professional interface optimized for analytics-heavy use cases. Some tools, however, require training to unlock their full potential.
Customer Support: Teams can access onboarding, live chat, and email help alongside an extensive knowledge hub. This ensures brands can troubleshoot and activate campaigns quickly.
HypeAuditor is optimized for analytics-heavy teams, emphasizing fraud detection, audience benchmarking, and data validation across multiple platforms. LWT is more focused on campaign management and content approvals, offering automation and direct influencer messaging without the same level of fraud screening.
Pricing for HypeAuditor is usage-based, starting around $10,000/year for business plans, which is transparent but oriented toward larger budgets. LWT’s pricing remains undisclosed, making it difficult to directly compare costs or scalability options.
HypeAuditor’s standout features include AI-powered fraud screening, live campaign monitoring, and competitor tracking, ensuring brands invest in authentic influencer relationships. LWT emphasizes automation, transparent bidding, and creator insights, but HypeAuditor excels in ensuring follower quality and detecting engagement anomalies.
Platform Coverage: Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, X (formerly Twitter), Twitch, and Snapchat.
Pricing: GRIN’s yearly pricing starts at $25.000, with monthly payments available at $2.085/month. No discounts for upfront payments.
Best For: Best suited for DTC brands looking to centralize influencer relationship management in one streamlined system.
Reviews: 4.5/5.0 (G2)
Ease of Use (UX/UI): GRIN is designed for intuitive influencer relationship management with smooth navigation for campaign basics. The system can slow when handling very large influencer lists or batch actions.
Customer Support: GRIN provides onboarding, chat, and email support, with premium users gaining access to dedicated strategists. Service quality can vary based on subscription level.
GRIN is tailored for DTC brands seeking end-to-end influencer relationship management, including affiliate tracking, ecommerce integrations, and automated campaign processes. LWT emphasizes discovery and performance analytics but lacks the deep ecommerce connection that GRIN provides.
GRIN’s pricing starts at $2,085/month or $25,000/year, which is clear and consistent, whereas LWT does not disclose costs publicly, creating uncertainty for potential clients.
GRIN also offers a unified communication hub, sales-linked CRM tools, and automated campaign workflows, enabling smoother collaboration and ROI tracking. LWT provides similar audience insights and campaign automation, but GRIN’s ecommerce and sales-linked capabilities make it more tailored to brands aiming for measurable revenue impact.
Best For: Taggbox is best for brands, retailers, hospitality, education, and agencies that want to collect, manage, and repurpose UGC at scale—then embed it across websites, product pages, events, and digital signage. It also supports influencer discovery and connections, but it’s not positioned as a full influencer CRM.
Platform Coverage: Taggbox covers Instagram, TikTok, Linkedin, X (Twitter) and YouTube.
Pricing: Taggbox offers four main subscription plans, each with higher feed limits, faster content updates, and expanded moderation tools.
Reviews: 4.8 / 5.0 (G2)
Ease of Use (UX/UI): Taggbox enables quick setup of user-generated content (UGC) feeds across multiple platforms. However, analytics depth requires manual work, and subscription changes can take up to a day to apply.
Customer Support: Paid plans include access to live chat and call-based troubleshooting, backed by tutorials. Some occasional glitches may delay urgent campaigns, making SLA confirmation important.
Taggbox focuses on UGC aggregation and influencer connections, making it suitable for brands looking to embed user-generated content across websites, product pages, and digital signage. LWT provides more traditional influencer campaign management with detailed audience insights, but lacks Taggbox’s robust UGC workflow.
Pricing for Taggbox is transparent, starting from $0/month for a basic plan up to $79/month for advanced features. LWT does not publicly list pricing, which can create uncertainty for budget planning compared to Taggbox’s clear tiers.
While Taggbox offers tools like content rights management, shoppable widgets, and hybrid AI/manual moderation, LWT provides direct influencer messaging, campaign automation, and a large creator database. Both platforms have strengths in campaign execution, but Taggbox is more specialized in content aggregation and UGC-driven marketing.
Best For: Heepsy is best for small to mid-sized businesses, agencies, and brands looking for a cost-effective way to identify and evaluate influencers. It’s particularly useful for companies wanting quick influencer search capabilities with a strong focus on data-driven decision-making.
Platform coverage: Instagram, TikTok and YouTube.
Pricing & Commitment: There are different plans:
Reviews: 4.5 / 5 (G2)
Ease of Use (UX/UI): Intuitive interface with straightforward filters for rapid influencer search. While easy for basic searches, advanced tools may feel limited compared to enterprise platforms.
Customer Support: Responsive support via chat and email, especially for onboarding. Lower-tier plans may encounter slower, reactive assistance.
Heepsy provides a cost-effective solution for small to mid-sized businesses, focusing on Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube influencer discovery. LWT, in contrast, covers primarily YouTube and Instagram but offers a more extensive global creator database, though pricing is opaque.
In terms of usability, Heepsy’s interface is intuitive and beginner-friendly, making quick searches and filtering simple for small teams. LWT offers a polished interface with campaign automation, but advanced reporting can require a learning curve for new users.
Support-wise, Heepsy provides responsive chat and email assistance, but lower-tier plans may see slower service. LWT offers onboarding and direct messaging with influencers, though deeper support or dedicated account management is often limited to enterprise-level subscriptions.
Best For: Cipio is best for Shopify/Amazon-focused eCommerce brands that want a fully managed UGC pipeline—from creator sourcing and gifting to producing ad-ready creatives and re-licensing content for paid and organic channels—without building in-house influencer operations.
Platform Coverage: While its main focus is Instagram, Cipio-created content can be repurposed for use across Facebook, TikTok, YouTube, and paid social ads, depending on the brand's distribution strategy.
Pricing: Cipio offers three flexible pricing models.
Pay-As-You-Go:
(No contract required; billed monthly based on usage.)
Quarterly Plan (min. 15 creators & 18 ads):
Annual Plan (min. 60 creators & 72 ads):
Reviews: 4.9 / 5.0 (Glassdoor)
Ease of Use (UX/UI): Service-first interface with limited hands-on control. Best for teams relying on managed workflows rather than self-service dashboards.
Customer Support: Account managers handle sourcing, outreach, and coordination proactively. Some visibility into creator communication may be restricted.
Cipio is tailored for eCommerce brands looking for a fully managed UGC and influencer workflow, with pricing based on creators and ad creatives. LWT provides broader campaign tools across YouTube and Instagram, but its pricing is not publicly disclosed, which may make budgeting more difficult.
LWT’s platform emphasizes self-service with campaign automation, enabling brands to manage discovery, approvals, and performance tracking. Cipio, on the other hand, offers a service-first interface, handling outreach, gifting, and content licensing on behalf of the brand, which reduces internal workload but limits self-serve control.
When it comes to support, Cipio provides proactive account management and hands-on guidance, while LWT offers standard support, chat functionality, and subscription tracking, reserving more personalized service for enterprise clients. Both platforms provide analytics, but Cipio focuses on UGC performance optimization and campaign ROAS, while LWT provides insights on influencer and audience data.
When evaluating alternatives to Look Who’s Talking (LWT), brands and agencies have a range of choices depending on their campaign needs and budget. Platforms like Heepsy and Taggbox are ideal for businesses seeking affordable influencer discovery and UGC management, while Cipio caters to eCommerce brands that want fully managed UGC campaigns.
Among these options, Influencer Hero stands out as a leading solution for influencer marketing across multiple social platforms. Its comprehensive features—including influencer discovery, performance tracking, campaign management, UGC measurement, and ROI reporting—provide actionable insights that help brands optimize influencer programs efficiently.
For brands looking to scale influencer campaigns with confidence, Influencer Hero combines usability, depth, and cross-platform functionality in a single tool. Request a demo today to see why it’s trusted by marketers who want precise, measurable, and high-impact influencer marketing results.
Some of the best alternatives to LWT include Influencer Hero, Upfluence, Aspire, Tagger, and Grin. Each of these platforms offers a range of features from influencer discovery and management to analytics and reporting. The choice of the best alternative depends on specific needs such as platform coverage, specific features like affiliate marketing or influencer gifting, and whether you're looking for additional services like agency support.
Alternative platforms to LWT often offer a competitive range of features. For instance, Influencer Hero provides a comprehensive suite that includes influencer finder, CRM, outreach, analytics, and affiliate marketing, positioning it as a feature-rich option. Platforms like Aspire and Tagger also offer robust analytics and management tools, with some differences in platform coverage and specific functionalities such as social listening or e-commerce integrations.
Influencer Hero is known to be a more cost-effective alternative, offering competitive influencer discovery and management features at a lower price point. It's a great option for brands or agencies with a tight budget but still in need of powerful analytics and CRM capabilities.
Platforms like Influencer Hero and Aspire offer both a SaaS platform and agency services, providing a blend of technology and professional support for influencer marketing campaigns. This combination can be particularly beneficial for businesses looking for hands-on assistance in addition to powerful software tools for their influencer marketing strategies.
Choosing the right LWT alternative involves evaluating several factors:
Schedule a Demo with one of our media experts below.